examined perpetrators versus executive
Dear blog readers, interested parties and victims of Useless industry
we always receive massive complaints that seem not to be identified or only very slowly.
These allegations relate to both the events in Germany, and Austria.
We answer in these cases with reference to the relevant investigating authority and give the reference to an ongoing investigation, the case number known to try and show how such a determination is made work.
Now multiply the symptoms for several weeks and therefore we want you all summarized and easily understandable explanation, what is the difficulty to undertake such investigations.
must be recognized first thing that you are in an area of economic crime moved in many places is completely new to: organize and structured, with clear tasks and assignments. Hidden under the coats of companies who are sitting abroad and protected by highly motivated employees who get good money for it to cover up evidence, to manipulate data and to obscure relationships. And all this in a highly technical area where specialists are rare, and it actually found only in the private sector.
The perpetrators have this massive money that can be deployed quickly and without prior authorization process. In addition there are very good specialists who are hired specifically for this money, and according to their skills quickly and without regard to any service regulations and trade laws.
Each of the offender at the head of the cartel has an excellent network of contacts. Both in the economy, as well as in politics, the media and sometimes even individual to justice.
knew these contacts until recently often have no idea who you are because had admitted and who had since broken a lance, or fürgesprochen.
And what we must not forget that many of these contacts relate to the relationship of the perpetrator of a not insubstantial income.
Now we have on the other side of the executive authorities, all of whom have neither the financial capital available to, for example, the best to use experts in the field of IT - apart from the fact that the law allowed a free choice it often does not allow - or so times just to make a journey to distant countries in order to keep in place a follow-up, nor have the authorities to to bypass existing laws, regulations, or instructions, or even break.
Other than that it is not possible for the legal representatives - even if they know where they would look - on foreign territory such as a hearing, or even to make a house search. This requires the authority be used on site. Which means again that over on the official service path Several weeks, inquiries and requests for assistance must be provided.
fails in many cases cooperation then the fact that the requested authority in foreign countries often lack of personnel not in a position to meet the request immediately.
And of course one must not be a very brutal truth forget
While working on the part of perpetrators, the highly paid most lawyers, the smartest engineers and accountants are, who are without travel barriers internationally, we have on the other hand, people who indeed committed but are often lagging behind in education.
What is not surprising, because a police officer is trained for more than just chase an impostor, or to interpret account activity.
In the case in, so if such a case such as this is now on record, must make the police and prosecutors and judges until the matter is known and to learn.
It is for the investigating authorities simply not possible to bring the next best specialists and just time to order for an expertise. This all has to be done and even worked in "homework" - and that takes time.
course, this is unsatisfactory and annoying. Of course, one wishes in these situations that the executive would have more rights and opportunities But the legal situation be it.
The perpetrators have as superior to nature, in many respects, have more money available, need not request a question, if you just sometimes want to speak with a "colleague" from abroad and the perpetrators must also prove nothing check and can. Which is sufficient to cite a suspect, an idea to act in order.
The executive, however, has it as very difficult: regulatory, restrictions, regulations, and above all
The executive must consider each charge that later was put on trial and should provide the proof.
And here, the authorities to overcome a massive obstacle
you are dependent on the cooperation of victims. Without victims, there is no law enforcement - without the testimony of victims and display there is no way to stop the perpetrators.
And we know from experience how difficult it is to force the victim to indicate his case to the next station.
Many fear the way to the police or prosecutors. For convenience, or simply out of fear of the unknown. Since people prefer to take into account, to lose even more money and the offender even longer to provide them with finance.
It is not enough about it excited to hurl abuse and how bad are the perpetrators, or that something is finally done.
In fact, it very often so that those who most loudly scolding dare not to go to the police and see the action.
why we always call back, send us questions, complaints, or information on crimes. We help the injured be attending to take the fear of the police to go with them by the hand to the next station, also help if they want to have a lawyer there and explain exactly what happens.
If you really want all that is that the perpetrators be prosecuted and punished, it is your Obligation to put up with the local police station in connection, and possibly bring to you the completed action to the police.
important to you is this:
criminal charges should be made if one assumes that a crime was committed. Whether a crime was committed, is then reviewed by the judiciary.
is also important: is it necessary to prove as an indicator that a crime was committed . This is for then the prosecuting authority.
that does not mean that one can simply ask for the pleasure and whim of a criminal complaint. Miss Do we need this instrument and it is shown that one of the innocence the suspect should have known, you can even become the target of a criminal justice: because of "false accusation" or "slander".
in this case is this: Do not make charges if they know or should have know that the money was debited from your account to be right. So a lawsuit against the power company because he collects money by direct debit is nonsensical. A criminal complaint against the perpetrators of the raid without your knowledge of your account, however dubious contractors very true and important.
Consider this:
When not on an ad, learns nothing about the justice of the offense and the best will in no one can . Pursue If more people, for example, an unauthorized debit have received from his account, report it, then there could be the firms that do not excuse a mistake. In addition, the legislators would respond quickly if the costs of prosecution for the increase in criminal charges are higher. In the event of unauthorized charges would be as well as increased accountability of the banks that have a charge under a contract of this company appear active, without being sure of the legality. This would require a modification of the terms of that for direct debits the debit memo written permission of the account holder must be surrendered Make sense. This is also the reason why some individuals named in their ads, the account-holding bank, when it comes to unjustified withdrawals. In the grounds of the display, they then declare that the bank, it probably has to be a lack of the necessary due diligence. Otherwise one could not explain this unjustified deduction.
So, it is identified. In Germany, as in Austria. But it takes time, we must also give the investigators.
alone the research that contributed to the foundations of this blog (and it is published only a fraction of what actually exists on the consideration Investigation authorities) have taken nearly two years.
And we have no service rules or official procedures that must be met.
remain the perpetrators are not punished.
you, as a victim, or even as an insider / in, which would get about the to have it in hand, to speed things up.
Log numerous and without fear of reprisals.
0 comments:
Post a Comment